Reading
Animal Camouflage and Mimicry
簡単
Reading
Animal Camouflage and Mimicry
簡単
Paragraph 1
In the constant struggle for survival, animals have evolved a stunning variety of strategies to avoid being eaten by predators and to successfully hunt their own prey. Among the most widespread and effective of these strategies are camouflage and mimicry. Camouflage allows an animal to blend in with its environment, making it difficult for others to see. Mimicry involves an animal evolving to resemble another creature or object, deceiving predators or prey for protection or gain. While often discussed together, these two strategies employ different principles to achieve the same fundamental goal: manipulating the perception of other organisms.
Paragraph 2
Camouflage, also known as cryptic coloration, is the art of concealment. The most common form is background matching, where an animal’s colors and patterns match its typical surroundings. For example, the sandy-colored fur of a desert fox helps it blend in with the dunes, while the mottled brown and green pattern of a flounder allows it to become nearly invisible against the pebbly seafloor. Another form of camouflage is disruptive coloration, which uses strongly contrasting markings like stripes or spots to break up the outlines of an animal's body. The bold stripes of a zebra, for instance, make it difficult for a predator to single out an individual from a running herd. A third type, countershading, is common in both terrestrial and aquatic animals. It involves having a darker top side and a lighter underside, which helps to counteract the effects of overhead sunlight, making the animal appear flatter and less three-dimensional.
Paragraph 3
Mimicry operates on the principle of deception rather than concealment. It is a form of biological imitation. There are two major types of mimicry. The first, Batesian mimicry, is named after the naturalist Henry Walter Bates. It involves a harmless species, the mimic, evolving to look like a dangerous or unpalatable species, the model. Predators that have had a bad experience with the model species learn to avoid it, and they subsequently also avoid the harmless mimic. A classic example is the viceroy butterfly, which is not poisonous but has evolved the same bright orange and black wing pattern as the toxic monarch butterfly.
Paragraph 4
The second major type is Müllerian mimicry, named for Fritz Müller. This occurs when two or more dangerous or unpalatable species evolve to resemble one another. By sharing a similar warning coloration, they mutually reinforce the signal to predators. A predator only needs to have a bad experience with one species in the mimicry ring to learn to avoid all of them. This shared warning system benefits all participating species because the learning process for predators is faster and the loss of individuals during that learning process is spread out across the different species. The similar black and yellow banding patterns found on many different species of stinging bees and wasps is a prime example of Müllerian mimicry.
Paragraph 5
Beyond these classic forms, some animals employ more aggressive types of mimicry. For example, the alligator snapping turtle has a worm-like appendage on its tongue. It lies motionless on the river bottom with its mouth open, wiggling the lure to attract fish that are looking for a meal, only to become a meal themselves. Some species of fireflies are also aggressive mimics; females of one species will imitate the mating flash patterns of another species to lure in males, whom they then capture and eat. These examples demonstrate the remarkable and often ruthless creativity of evolution, showing how the principles of camouflage and mimicry are adapted for a wide array of survival challenges.
The word 'stunning' in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to...
The word 'unpalatable' in paragraph 3 is closest in meaning to...
According to paragraph 2, what is the purpose of disruptive coloration?
What is implied about the monarch butterfly in paragraph 3?
How does Müllerian mimicry benefit the species involved, according to paragraph 4?
Why does the author mention the alligator snapping turtle in paragraph 5?
What is a key difference between Batesian and Müllerian mimicry?
According to the passage, camouflage and mimicry are similar in that they both...
Look at the four squares [■] that indicate where the following sentence could be added to paragraph 4. Where would the sentence best fit?
In this case, the mimic is not bluffing.
An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.
Animals use camouflage and mimicry as key survival strategies that work by manipulating the perception of other organisms.
Select 3 answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.
Paragraph 1
In the constant struggle for survival, animals have evolved a stunning variety of strategies to avoid being eaten by predators and to successfully hunt their own prey. Among the most widespread and effective of these strategies are camouflage and mimicry. Camouflage allows an animal to blend in with its environment, making it difficult for others to see. Mimicry involves an animal evolving to resemble another creature or object, deceiving predators or prey for protection or gain. While often discussed together, these two strategies employ different principles to achieve the same fundamental goal: manipulating the perception of other organisms.
Paragraph 2
Camouflage, also known as cryptic coloration, is the art of concealment. The most common form is background matching, where an animal’s colors and patterns match its typical surroundings. For example, the sandy-colored fur of a desert fox helps it blend in with the dunes, while the mottled brown and green pattern of a flounder allows it to become nearly invisible against the pebbly seafloor. Another form of camouflage is disruptive coloration, which uses strongly contrasting markings like stripes or spots to break up the outlines of an animal's body. The bold stripes of a zebra, for instance, make it difficult for a predator to single out an individual from a running herd. A third type, countershading, is common in both terrestrial and aquatic animals. It involves having a darker top side and a lighter underside, which helps to counteract the effects of overhead sunlight, making the animal appear flatter and less three-dimensional.
Paragraph 3
Mimicry operates on the principle of deception rather than concealment. It is a form of biological imitation. There are two major types of mimicry. The first, Batesian mimicry, is named after the naturalist Henry Walter Bates. It involves a harmless species, the mimic, evolving to look like a dangerous or unpalatable species, the model. Predators that have had a bad experience with the model species learn to avoid it, and they subsequently also avoid the harmless mimic. A classic example is the viceroy butterfly, which is not poisonous but has evolved the same bright orange and black wing pattern as the toxic monarch butterfly.
Paragraph 4
The second major type is Müllerian mimicry, named for Fritz Müller. This occurs when two or more dangerous or unpalatable species evolve to resemble one another. By sharing a similar warning coloration, they mutually reinforce the signal to predators. A predator only needs to have a bad experience with one species in the mimicry ring to learn to avoid all of them. This shared warning system benefits all participating species because the learning process for predators is faster and the loss of individuals during that learning process is spread out across the different species. The similar black and yellow banding patterns found on many different species of stinging bees and wasps is a prime example of Müllerian mimicry.
Paragraph 5
Beyond these classic forms, some animals employ more aggressive types of mimicry. For example, the alligator snapping turtle has a worm-like appendage on its tongue. It lies motionless on the river bottom with its mouth open, wiggling the lure to attract fish that are looking for a meal, only to become a meal themselves. Some species of fireflies are also aggressive mimics; females of one species will imitate the mating flash patterns of another species to lure in males, whom they then capture and eat. These examples demonstrate the remarkable and often ruthless creativity of evolution, showing how the principles of camouflage and mimicry are adapted for a wide array of survival challenges.
The word 'stunning' in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to...
The word 'unpalatable' in paragraph 3 is closest in meaning to...
According to paragraph 2, what is the purpose of disruptive coloration?
What is implied about the monarch butterfly in paragraph 3?
How does Müllerian mimicry benefit the species involved, according to paragraph 4?
Why does the author mention the alligator snapping turtle in paragraph 5?
What is a key difference between Batesian and Müllerian mimicry?
According to the passage, camouflage and mimicry are similar in that they both...
Look at the four squares [■] that indicate where the following sentence could be added to paragraph 4. Where would the sentence best fit?
In this case, the mimic is not bluffing.
An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.
Animals use camouflage and mimicry as key survival strategies that work by manipulating the perception of other organisms.
Select 3 answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.