英語リーディング
認知バイアスと戦略的な価格設定
4回解答
難しい
解き方に迷ったら、関連教材を確認
英語リーディング
認知バイアスと戦略的な価格設定
4回解答
難しい
Article Excerpt: The Pervasive Influence of Anchoring Bias
The anchoring effect, or anchoring bias, is a cognitive tendency that describes how humans rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the 'anchor') when making decisions. Once the anchor is set, subsequent judgments are made by adjusting away from it, but these adjustments are typically insufficient. This phenomenon occurs even when the initial number is entirely irrelevant to the decision being made. For example, when asked to estimate the population of a distant city, people often produce higher estimates if they are first asked whether the population is larger or smaller than a very large number (like 10 million) than if they are first asked about a very small number (like 1,000). The anchor distorts the perception of the acceptable range of values, leading to irrational outcomes in fields ranging from real estate negotiations to legal sentencing.
Hypothetical Retail Experiment on Pricing
A group of 200 consumers were asked to estimate the fair price for a new high-tech backpack. They were divided into four groups, each given a different initial 'anchor' price before being asked for their final price estimate.
| Group | Anchor Price Asked | Final Median Price Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Is the price higher or lower than $30? | $55 |
| Group B | Is the price higher or lower than $80? | $75 |
| Group C | Is the price higher or lower than $130? | $90 |
| Group D | No anchor question asked. | $65 |
Note: Group D's estimate is considered the baseline market value.
Email: Action Plan for New Product Launch
To: Marketing Team
From: Dr. Emi Nakamura, Decision Science Consultant
Date: March 10
Subject: Pricing Strategy for 'X-Gear' Backpack
Following our meeting last week, I'd like to emphasize one key takeaway: we must strategically utilize the anchoring effect in our launch materials for the 'X-Gear' backpack. Research shows that consumers' willingness to pay is significantly influenced by the first price they encounter. Therefore, my recommendation is to launch the 'Premium Bundle' first, priced at 85. Do not launch the Basic model first, as this lower initial anchor will suppress subsequent price estimates. We need to frame the initial conversation around the high-value, high-cost option to make the target price of $85 seem like a good deal by comparison.
The difference in the final median price estimates between Group A (65) in the Hypothetical Retail Experiment most strongly supports which idea presented in the Article Excerpt?
What is the primary psychological risk Dr. Emi Nakamura is attempting to avoid by recommending the launch of the 'Premium Bundle' first?
Assuming the Marketing Team follows the strategy outlined in the Email, what is the difference between the anchor price and the intended target selling price?
Based on the Article Excerpt and the Email, what is the correct logical sequence of the four key steps in Dr. Nakamura's strategy to successfully influence the consumer's purchase decision?
Article Excerpt: The Pervasive Influence of Anchoring Bias
The anchoring effect, or anchoring bias, is a cognitive tendency that describes how humans rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the 'anchor') when making decisions. Once the anchor is set, subsequent judgments are made by adjusting away from it, but these adjustments are typically insufficient. This phenomenon occurs even when the initial number is entirely irrelevant to the decision being made. For example, when asked to estimate the population of a distant city, people often produce higher estimates if they are first asked whether the population is larger or smaller than a very large number (like 10 million) than if they are first asked about a very small number (like 1,000). The anchor distorts the perception of the acceptable range of values, leading to irrational outcomes in fields ranging from real estate negotiations to legal sentencing.
Hypothetical Retail Experiment on Pricing
A group of 200 consumers were asked to estimate the fair price for a new high-tech backpack. They were divided into four groups, each given a different initial 'anchor' price before being asked for their final price estimate.
| Group | Anchor Price Asked | Final Median Price Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Is the price higher or lower than $30? | $55 |
| Group B | Is the price higher or lower than $80? | $75 |
| Group C | Is the price higher or lower than $130? | $90 |
| Group D | No anchor question asked. | $65 |
Note: Group D's estimate is considered the baseline market value.
Email: Action Plan for New Product Launch
To: Marketing Team
From: Dr. Emi Nakamura, Decision Science Consultant
Date: March 10
Subject: Pricing Strategy for 'X-Gear' Backpack
Following our meeting last week, I'd like to emphasize one key takeaway: we must strategically utilize the anchoring effect in our launch materials for the 'X-Gear' backpack. Research shows that consumers' willingness to pay is significantly influenced by the first price they encounter. Therefore, my recommendation is to launch the 'Premium Bundle' first, priced at 85. Do not launch the Basic model first, as this lower initial anchor will suppress subsequent price estimates. We need to frame the initial conversation around the high-value, high-cost option to make the target price of $85 seem like a good deal by comparison.
The difference in the final median price estimates between Group A (65) in the Hypothetical Retail Experiment most strongly supports which idea presented in the Article Excerpt?
What is the primary psychological risk Dr. Emi Nakamura is attempting to avoid by recommending the launch of the 'Premium Bundle' first?
Assuming the Marketing Team follows the strategy outlined in the Email, what is the difference between the anchor price and the intended target selling price?
Based on the Article Excerpt and the Email, what is the correct logical sequence of the four key steps in Dr. Nakamura's strategy to successfully influence the consumer's purchase decision?