英語リーディング
学校におけるスマートフォン利用規則の変更
普通
解き方に迷ったら、関連教材を確認
英語リーディング
学校におけるスマートフォン利用規則の変更
普通
School Announcement: New Smartphone Policy
To: All Students and Guardians From: Principal Takeda Date: September 15 Subject: Changes to the School Smartphone Policy
Starting October 1st, we are implementing a revised policy regarding smartphone use on campus. The previous rule required all smartphones to be powered off and kept in lockers throughout the school day (8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.). This rule was intended to reduce distractions and cyberbullying.
However, in response to requests from the Student Council and concerns from guardians regarding emergency communication, the policy will be updated. The new rule permits students to use their smartphones during the lunch break (12:30 p.m. to 1:10 p.m.) and after 3:30 p.m.
Key Requirements for New Policy:
Student Council Meeting Minutes (Excerpt)
Date: September 8 Topic: Proposal for Relaxed Smartphone Rules
Discussion Summary: Student representative Haruka noted that many students felt anxious about being completely cut off from communication, particularly concerning after-school club coordination and family emergencies. The Council voted unanimously to propose a new rule that would allow phone use during free time. A major point of debate was the timing: should phones be allowed during break times between classes? The Council ultimately decided to only propose use during the longer lunch break and after dismissal, as allowing phone use between classes would lead to late arrivals and increased noise levels. The proposal, which also included a pledge from the student body to self-regulate, was sent to the Principal on September 9th.
What is the primary reason the school decided to change the existing smartphone policy?
Based on both the School Announcement and the Student Council Meeting Minutes, which of the following statements about the old and new policies is correct?
From the Student Council's decision to restrict their proposal to only the lunch break and after dismissal, what can be reasonably inferred about their concerns?
School Announcement: New Smartphone Policy
To: All Students and Guardians From: Principal Takeda Date: September 15 Subject: Changes to the School Smartphone Policy
Starting October 1st, we are implementing a revised policy regarding smartphone use on campus. The previous rule required all smartphones to be powered off and kept in lockers throughout the school day (8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.). This rule was intended to reduce distractions and cyberbullying.
However, in response to requests from the Student Council and concerns from guardians regarding emergency communication, the policy will be updated. The new rule permits students to use their smartphones during the lunch break (12:30 p.m. to 1:10 p.m.) and after 3:30 p.m.
Key Requirements for New Policy:
Student Council Meeting Minutes (Excerpt)
Date: September 8 Topic: Proposal for Relaxed Smartphone Rules
Discussion Summary: Student representative Haruka noted that many students felt anxious about being completely cut off from communication, particularly concerning after-school club coordination and family emergencies. The Council voted unanimously to propose a new rule that would allow phone use during free time. A major point of debate was the timing: should phones be allowed during break times between classes? The Council ultimately decided to only propose use during the longer lunch break and after dismissal, as allowing phone use between classes would lead to late arrivals and increased noise levels. The proposal, which also included a pledge from the student body to self-regulate, was sent to the Principal on September 9th.
What is the primary reason the school decided to change the existing smartphone policy?
Based on both the School Announcement and the Student Council Meeting Minutes, which of the following statements about the old and new policies is correct?
From the Student Council's decision to restrict their proposal to only the lunch break and after dismissal, what can be reasonably inferred about their concerns?